What is the correct procedure regarding ACURO review and IACUC approval?

What is the correct procedure regarding ACURO review and IACUC approval?

• A. Only IACUC approval is required
• B. Work may begin after IACUC approval; ACURO funds require further approval
• C. Both approvals are needed simultaneously
• D. ACURO only reviews unapproved protocols

Answer: (B)

The correct procedure regarding ACURO review and IACUC approval indicates that after IACUC approval is obtained, work may commence, but further approval from ACURO is necessary if funds are involved. This process ensures that while the research has been deemed compliant with institutional and federal animal welfare regulations by the IACUC, any financial support tied to the awards requires an additional layer of review by ACURO. This distinction emphasizes a two-step approval process where the IACUC focuses on the ethical treatment of animals in research, while ACURO deals with the specifics of how funds relate to the approved research. Understanding this distinction is crucial for compliance and for researchers to manage their projects effectively within the regulatory framework governing animal research.

The correct procedure regarding ACURO review and IACUC approval indicates that after IACUC approval is obtained, work may commence, but further approval from ACURO is necessary if funds are involved. This process ensures that while the research has been deemed compliant with institutional and federal animal welfare regulations by the IACUC, any financial support tied to the awards requires an additional layer of review by ACURO.

This distinction emphasizes a two-step approval process where the IACUC focuses on the ethical treatment of animals in research, while ACURO deals with the specifics of how funds relate to the approved research. Understanding this distinction is crucial for compliance and for researchers to manage their projects effectively within the regulatory framework governing animal research.